skip to content
 
 

Briefing Paper

National Identity in Scotland

by David McCrone

graphic: pillar

 

Since the mid-1980s, surveys have been using a simple, but useful, question on the extent to which people mix and match national (Scottish) and state (British) identities, as follows:

'Which of these best describes how you see yourself?'

% by column

1986

1992

1997

1999

2000

Scottish not British

39

19

23

32

37

More Scottish than British

30

40

38

34

31

Equally Scottish and British

19

33

27

23

21

More British than Scottish

4

3

4

3

3

British not Scottish

6

3

4

4

4

None of these

2

1

2

4

4

base

1021

957

882

1482

1663

Source: Moreno, 1998; Scottish Election Surveys, 1992, 1997; Scottish Parliamentary Election Study, 1999; Scottish Social Attitudes Study, 2000.

 

Again, this can be read in conjunction with a 'forced choice' question; whether people consider themselves first and foremost Scottish or British. Thus,

National Identity by year

%

1979

1992

1997

1999

2000

Scottish

56

72

72

77

80

British

38

25

24

17

13

base

661

957

882

1482

1663

Figures shown are % of respondents choosing 'best' identity, either Scottish or British

Sources: Scottish Election Surveys, 1979,1992, 1997; Scottish Parliamentary Election Survey, 1999; Scottish Social Attitudes Survey, 2000

 

GENERAL POINTS ON NATIONAL IDENTITY IN SCOTLAND

  1. People living in Scotland give much higher priority to being Scottish over being British. This holds broadly true for gender, social class, religion and region. Nevertheless, most people claim dual identity, and that Scots still remain 'British' in significant numbers. Compared with Wales and England, people in Scotland are much more likely to emphasise their Scottishness over their Britishness than either the Welsh or the English.

  2. Over time, the results are fairly consistent, and there has not been a shift towards or away from Scottish identity in any simple sense in the last decade. The setting up of the parliament has not made people feel any more or, indeed, any less Scottish, although both the referendum and the first Scottish parliamentary election saw a firming up of 'Scottish only' identity.

  3. There is no simple relationship between national identity, constitutional preferences and political behaviour in Scotland. Thus, supporters of all parties are much more likely to describe themselves first and foremost as Scottish, including Conservatives, and including those who opposed the setting up of the parliament. Likewise, a significant number of SNP supporters retain a sense of being British, and Labour voters are overwhelmingly Scottish. In other words, being Scottish is a taken-for-granted assumption, and underpins virtually all social, political and cultural life in Scotland. It is not a straightforward predictor of party political or constitutional preferences.

  4. People in Scotland have a clear understanding of the distinction between 'national' (Scottish) and 'state' (British) identities in a way people in England do not. Nevertheless, there seems to have been a shift towards greater numbers of people south of the border calling themselves 'English' in recent years. There is no systematic evidence that this has been caused by Scottish (or Welsh) devolution, and there is no evidence of English resentment on this score.

  5. Identity is not a badge which people carry around with them unchanged. It is much more like a set of claims they make according to the context in which they find themselves, be these cultural, political and so on. Hugh McIlvanney once observed: 'Identity, personal or national, isn't merely something you have like a passport. It is also something you rediscover daily, like a strange country. Its core isn't something like a mountain. It is something molten, like magna.' (The Herald, 13 March 1999)

  6. Being Scottish seems much more attached to 'a sense of place' rather than a 'sense of tribe', as the historian TC Smout observed. That is, the sense of territorial, civic, identity appears stronger than an 'ethnic' one such that people can claim to be Scottish by living here. The parliament reinforces that sense of 'place' insofar as people participate because they live here, not simply because they were born here. Further, the evidence seems to suggest that the longer people who were not born here live in Scotland, the more likely they feel able to make a claim to be Scottish. It is also noticeable that young people of Asian origin are likely to operate hybrid identities such as Scottish Muslim or Scottish Pakistani, whereas the 'English' descriptor is missing in their peers south of the border. Historians back this up by telling us that 'the Scots' have always been plural in cultural and regional terms, in McIlvanney's phrase, a 'mongrel' people.

  7. Finally, one should not assume nor expect an unchanging sense of Scottishness. Just as there was a strong set of conservative and religious (mainly Protestant) values underpinning the sense of being Scottish in the 19th century, so Scots today define and describe themselves in secular, progressive and liberal terms according to life as they find it in the 21st century. There is no powerful set of religious and/or linguistic cultural markers which define what it means to be a Scot which means that identity can be much more open and inclusive.

 

David McCrone
Professor of Sociology
University of Edinburgh

 

(Published Online: 10 January 2002)

 

graphic back to top

 

View available articles by AUTHOR

View by DATE published online

 

read the latest issue of
PARLIAMENT NEWS
Scottish Affairs
journal
Find out about our Political Internship Programme
at the Institute